Welcome to ChinglishFriend Sign in | Subscribe | Help

ChinglishFriend

A place for friendship and adventure

Danwei

Browse by Tags

All Tags » Tourism
Sorry, but there are no more tags available to filter with.

  • Vietnam travel advice

    vietnam+travel+notes.jpg

    Your correspondent went on a brief trip to Vietnam recently. Seeking travel advice, I stumbled upon the blog of Vietnam resident Adam Hurley: Vietnam Travel Notes.

    It's a useful resource if you are planning a Vietnam trip. Adam can help you book tours and make other travel arrangements, and is also happy to give you free travel advice.

    This article is from Danwei.org

  • Chasing the Chinese tourist dollar

    Bloomberg's Asia desk has published something resembling a news article, but it's really just a stream of consciousness outpouring of numbers and statistics, combined with some hype about online ticket merchant Ctrip.com. The numbers are however interesting. Excerpt:

    Ctrip Says Tour Sales May Triple as More Chinese Travel Abroad

    Package-tour sales may rise to as much as 15 percent of revenue in five years from about 5.6 percent in 2007, Ctrip Chief Financial Officer Jane Sun said in an interview March 6 in Shanghai, where the company is based.

    More Chinese are vacationing overseas ... China ... may become the world's biggest source of outbound tourists by 2020, surpassing current leader Germany, according to CLSA Ltd.

    "The number of Chinese traveling abroad is going to increase ..." said Catherine Leung, a Hong Kong-based analyst with Citigroup Inc., who rates Ctrip's stock "buy."...

    Ctrip currently gets about 90 percent of sales from travel within China. Hotel and air ticket bookings accounted for 92 percent of sales in 2007, a level that may decline to 70 percent within five years as the portion from package tours increases, Sun said.

    ...Ctrip ... charges as little as $550 for a six-day trip to a resort on Thailand's Phuket island.

    The company also has packages to cities including Paris, Rome and Sydney.

    Ctrip plans to offer trips for Chinese tourists to the U.S. after the two nations sign an agreement allowing companies in China to market and sell packaged tours to American destinations, Sun said...

    ...Ctrip's package-tour sales may jump 72 percent to 122 million yuan this year, and then double to 255 million yuan in 2010, according to a Feb. 28 report by Morgan Stanley Asia Ltd.

    This article is from Danwei.org

  • Who's responsible for Chinese tourists' poor image abroad?

    JDM070719lvyou.jpg
    What pretty scenery!
    There's a growing sense that Chinese travelers are replacing Americans as the most undesirable tourists to encounter abroad. Of course, the evidence is mostly anecdotal, and according to some domestic media, things are actually improving.

    In May, International Herald Leader, a globally-oriented weekly associated with Xinhua's Reference News, reported on the improving situation of Chinese tourists in Egypt:

    [Tourist guide] Wang Xiaolong told this reporter that the behavioral awareness of Chinese tourists who came to Egypt had been getting better; there were far fewer incidents of loud voices and spitting than in the past....Chinese tourists have begun harmonious tourism alongside world travelers.

    Positive developments notwithstanding, there is still a general feeling that Chinese tourists are not entirely harmonious when they go abroad.

    In a June blog post that was recently republished in Wen *** Bao, blogger Wu Fei looked for a root cause of the phenomenon:

    On "Internal Image"

    by Wu Fei

    Whenever a foreign guest came during the Cultural Revolution, considerable pains were taken to change the appearance of life to present a scene of prosperity so as to prevent Antonioni-types from shooting images of backwardness with their cameras. These days, it's annoying to write about the past: when I mention Antonioni, I probably should add a footnote. Oh, well, I won't worry about it. I remember that when the communes assigned production teams to criticize "Antoni" (the "-oni" at the end probably made it too long so the peasants couldn't read it), commune members were not at all enthusiastic, because no one had any idea what movies "Antoni" had shot. Only the cities were fierce in their criticism, particularly the capital Beijing and those places that Anonioni's camera had swept over (of course, the reaction was overdone so that they could extricate themselves from any political relationship). There were endless big-character posters then, with focused firepower. Looking back now, you wonder to what degree the Italian film world was perplexed and alarmed at the scene of the Chinese criticism. If "Antoni" had been born in China, he'd have been "turned over to the masses," and his life would be over. Then a few years ago I was fortunate enough to see the true face of Chung Kuo, and there really wasn't anything wrong with it. I thought that Antonioni even beautified a China engulfed in the Cultural Revolution.

    Those were real conditions of our homes shot by foreign devils with their machines. People sat at home and disaster descended down from heaven, and there was nothing that could be done. Last year, there was public discussion of "the image of Chinese tourists abroad," meaning the various uncivilized behaviors that Chinese people bring out for all to see when they went go overseas. I think that so-called uncivilized behavior abroad has nothing to do with fierce farmers and their shrewish wives out in the countryside, because our country's poor people don't have the money to leave the country to sightsee. I don't think I have to tell you what sort of person it is who can frequently go abroad to sightsee. I have a couple of friends who study the history of foreign thought and literature; their works are fairly influential inside the country, but they've never been abroad because no one's ever thought that they should know about foreign things - strange, eh? Then take a look at the how officials carp - they always say that they're dead tired and crazy busy, next week they've got to go overseas but the just got back a few months ago and they haven't even gotten over the jet lag yet. Las Vegas again - what's the point...?

    So the "poor overseas image" comes about because there has been no move to cultivate a good domestic image. There's no difference between inside and outside the country - they're identical. Chinese people pay money to run off to spend a few days in civilized countries, where they throw trash everywhere, spit, scratch their toes, and talk loudly - their "true colors," right? Don't they do this at home, too? Or should they be twice as scrupulous and use a tissue to wrap up every hair that falls from their head so that it doesn't drop on the floor? Putting the rest aside for the moment, let's just talk about when you spoke at the meeting criticizing the "poor overseas image" of Chinese people - why did you speak so loudly? Why did your speaking voice get louder and louder? Would overseas officials present their reports like this? This topic was beaten to death long ago, but it looks like no one cares. The Chinese people have probably been so heroic and fierce since ancient times - who doesn't feel a sense of self-satisfaction standing at the entrance to town and rocking the people with their bellowing? Haven't some of today's cadres won authority and promotions through their "echoing voices"? People who make continual blunders are those who are habitually crude at home; when it's their turn to go overseas, they show off the home-style manners they brought with them.

    Where do crude habits come from? Were they dropped down from heaven? Or are they flies that slipped into the country from abroad as things reformed and opened up? Neither. They are an accumulation of Chinese culture over the course of the ages, and they are in practice every day. Who among China's despots thought to let their subjects live with dignity and exercise their rights, who ever cherished the honor of the people? Despots only sought ways to lay waste to their subjects, to keep them from standing up, to prevent them having their own will and thoughts. This is the "old root" cultivated by autocratic culture. Consider: a people who bow immediately upon seeing an imperial edict, who kneel upon seeing an official, who are called "grass people," "black heads," and "cloth clothing," and who offer thanks for the benevolence of whoever gives them a good word - does such a people have any dignity? For example, when a county mayor goes to inspect a school, the principal will have young students stand out in the cold wind for two or three hours. Do people who are raised like this have any self-esteem? Can they feel anything but inferior?

    At the Shanghai train station once, station workers and police were taking turns pushing passengers into the station, incessantly yelling "Faster! Faster! Faster!" It was still early, and this station was the train's initial point of departure. There was no need for them to spur passengers to run like that. I gently advised them not to push people, since in my opinion that action was degrading. I never imagined that a policeman would glare at me and snap back, "So what if I push them? Are you looking for trouble?" Evidently in their eyes passengers don't count for much. However, in another setting, police may also be in a weakened position. One evening I saw a line of police standing along several roads, one ever twenty or thirty meters. I asked curiously, "Who's coming?" The policeman said listlessly, "You think they'd tell me?" Comparing the two situations it's not hard to see that in a strict, hierarchical society, personal dignity is not guaranteed.

    To cultivate an "overseas image," you must first respect the dignity of your own countrymen.

    Even if Ah Q could become a county or city mayor, or an even higher official, without changing his bad habits, Young D and Whiskers Wang would still have no hope of becoming gentlemen in Weizhuang, for their every action would show off their true colors. Look at the annual group of fallen officials, or those bureaucrats who are certain to fall in the future. Who among them is a gentleman in his daily actions?

    So to change the image of Chinese people abroad is not merely a matter that can be handled by passing out out "Notes for Going Abroad" to international tourists. It must be dug out at the root.

    Links and Sources

  • Online voting and the new wonders of the world

    JDM070711greatwall.jpg
    Now that the Great Wall of China has been named an official New Wonder of the World by worldwide acclaim, we can ask the big questions: who benefits, and what's the point of it all, anyway?

    The election was held over the course of more than one year, with votes submitted by phone, SMS, or the Internet. The organizer, the New Open World Corporation, financed the election through revenue gained from the voting process and the sales of memorabilia and broadcast rights, and it promised to use 50% of the proceeds to fund worldwide restoration efforts.

    How it plans to carry out protection and preservation efforts has not been made clear, however. It presumably generated quite a bit of income during the election period - when will the Great Wall see some of that money? Here's part of an op-ed that ran in The Beijing News on Monday:

    In general, private foundations and governmental organizations whose public service campaigns solicit funds through commercial operations gain trust on the basis of whether they clearly tell people the fund's usage numbers, such as what percentage is used for overhead costs, what percentage is taken out as profit for the operators, and what percentage is used for public service. In addition, the organizers must explain the application procedure and the schedule for release of funds, as well as the methods for calculating contributions and making the books public. Usually, the total amount of donations, and how they are to be divided, is announced when the voting is made public.

    According to these conventions, the "New Seven Wonders" foundation's reliability is suspect. It declared the list of winners in a grand ceremony and promised that 50% of the take would be used for preservation and protection, but it has not announced the total income.
    ...
    Finally let us look at the operation of the SMS voting service in the China region. A reporter tried out free online voting - it was very complicated and required spending 20 minutes, so the average person would have no patience for it. It appears as if the organizers concentrated their efforts on paid SMS voting. Now that the Great Wall has won first place, it is obvious that numbers should be extremely high for international calls and SMS from the China region, a substantial contribution to the foundation. If statistical results are at odds with common sense, then who is it who's eaten the money?

    Before the total amount of donations are disclosed, before the number of votes from the China region are announced, before the Great Wall has received money for repairs, this is all empty celebration. We hope that this is not a case of an international campaign duping our countrymen. We await expectantly to find out exactly how much the Great Wall will receive for protection.

    Official statements from UNESCO criticized the "mediatised campaign" and contrasted the election with its own more scholarly approach to world heritage. At a press conference, spokesman Christian Manhart explained that while the organization believes that the winners are worthy world wonders, there are certainly more than just seven wonders in the world today - UNESCO's 851 world heritage sites all qualify. The NewOpenWorld Foundation countered by accusing UNESCO of ignoring the voice of 90 million people all across the world.

    Then there's the question of whether the Great Wall even deserved to be in the running. Luo Zhewen, head of the Ancient Architecture Group at the State Bureau of Cultural Relics, noted that the Great Wall and the Porcelain Tower of Nanjing (now destroyed) were named to a list of the Seven Wonders of the Middle Ages. The list, whose date of composition is in dispute, also included the Roman Colosseum. Since Egypt's Great Pyramids were nixed for being one of the original Seven Wonders, their citation medieval list ought to disqualify the Colosseum and the Great Wall.

    Another group of critics questioned whether the list misses the bigger picture. On Guangming Online's Observer forum, Xuan Huahua wrote that "Selling snake-oil to the global village is the real New Wonder," drawing parallels to the "Lunar Embassy" that sold plots of land on the moon to gullible terrestrial investors. Slightly less vituperative was an op-ed in yesterday's TBN by Bai Shuo, who saw the online campaign in support of the Great Wall as the true wonder:

    Domestic media first noticed this campaign in January of last year, and the Great Wall stood temporarily at the top of the list. In November, things took a sudden turn for the worse, and the Great Wall fell to fourth.

    By April, the Great Wall dropped out of the top seven. To reverse the decline, interested organizations began campaigning for votes through various channels. The voting page was written in English, so to solve the problem of the vast majority of Chinese people being unable to vote because they could not read a foreign language, a "SMS vote" service was developed. This innovative development lent a new face to the survey.

    Simultaneously, a new round the click campaign took shape on major websites, forums, and blogs. Some netizens took the layout of the voting website and created a step-by-step voting process to assist voters who had language difficulties, and some people even appended images of the stated of the voting process. With help from forum reposters, this post to get out the vote for the Great Wall traversed the Chinese Internet.

    After a dynamic "online click campaign," the Great Wall finally found the honor it deserved, with "World's #1" in its pocket. Looking back at the past year or more, you'll easily discover that the true "wonder of the world" was not constructed several thousand years ago by builders piling up stones to form the Great Wall; rather, it was pushed out by contemporary, wired Chinese youth clicking their left mouse buttons over and over. You could say that just as the builders who toiled on the construction of the Great Wall gave of their blood and sweat, industrious online youth broke countless mice and numbed countless click fingers for this "hit count" wonder.
    ...
    In their free-time away from game playing and after they've finished chatting, when they're taking a break from their download programs, idle online youth engage in the back-and-forth exercise of clicking and refreshing. This is a relaxed, diverting, selfless act. Does it mean anything? In truth, it really doesn't matter. In the end it's just a mass exercise - at least there's nothing wrong about it. And it even wraps itself in the mantle of "national glory."

    I've seen media reports that say that European and North American countries were unconcerned with the "wonders" of their countries. Many foreigners voted for the Great Wall, but very few voted for their own country's "wonder." This describes a certain problem: either those foreigners are not patriotic, or we have a few youth whose methods of patriotism are quite out of the ordinary.

    Links and Sources

Search

 Go